- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2006 19:41:05 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Andrew Fedoniouk <news@terrainformatica.com>
- Cc: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, Ignacio Javier <ijavier@efenet.com>, www-style@w3.org
On Tue, 7 Mar 2006, Andrew Fedoniouk wrote: > > "If the pixel density of the output device is very different from that > of a typical computer display, the user agent should rescale pixel > values. It is recommended that the reference pixel be the visual angle > of one pixel on a device with a pixel density of 96dpi and a distance > from the reader of an arm's length." > > As you may see such rescaling is not a mandatory. It is mandatory unless the implementor has a good reason not to do it. What good reason would that be? > And probably it is better to replace 150px by something more reliable > like 10cm ? 150px is the de facto standard. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 7 March 2006 19:41:19 UTC