- From: Andrew Fedoniouk <news@terrainformatica.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2006 11:34:06 -0800
- To: "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: "Boris Zbarsky" <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, "Ignacio Javier" <ijavier@efenet.com>, <www-style@w3.org>
----- Original Message ----- From: "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch> To: "Andrew Fedoniouk" <news@terrainformatica.com> Cc: "Boris Zbarsky" <bzbarsky@mit.edu>; "Ignacio Javier" <ijavier@efenet.com>; <www-style@w3.org> Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 10:52 AM Subject: Re: [css21] height: [percent] | | On Tue, 7 Mar 2006, Andrew Fedoniouk wrote: | > | > And what if 150px is too small? E.g. on printer it could be 3mm or so. | | "px" is not a device pixel, it's a visual angle pixel defined relative to | 96dpi. Please see the spec for the full definition. "If the pixel density of the output device is very different from that of a typical computer display, the user agent should rescale pixel values. It is recommended that the reference pixel be the visual angle of one pixel on a device with a pixel density of 96dpi and a distance from the reader of an arm's length." As you may see such rescaling is not a mandatory. And probably it is better to replace 150px by something more reliable like 10cm ? If this magic number is really needed. Why not use some relative value like 50% of width of the view or so? Andrew Fedoniouk. http://terrainformatica.com | | -- | Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL | http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. | Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.' |
Received on Tuesday, 7 March 2006 19:34:48 UTC