- From: Stewart Brodie <stewart.brodie@antplc.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 12:37:26 +0100
- To: www-style@w3.org
"Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com> wrote: > > On Tue, 11 Jul 2006 18:43:49 +0200, Stewart Brodie > <stewart.brodie@antplc.com> wrote: > > [...] or use a DOM method to describe it: > > So it's actually defined like that in > http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-selectors/#empty-pseudo ... > > # In terms of the DOM, only element nodes and text nodes > # (including CDATA nodes and entity references) whose data > # has a non-zero length must be considered as affecting > # emptiness; comments, PIs, and other nodes must not affect > # whether an element is considered empty or not. > > Seems quite clear to me. Yes, that definition accompanies the section for the pseudo-class. It's perfectly clear. The one line description in the summary in section 2 is the problem the OP was thinking of, AFAICT. Maybe the clarification the OP was looking for would be resolved by appending a comment to the line for E:empty to refer the reader to the full definition of "empty" in the section that describes the :empty pseudo (at that part of the spec that link takes you to) -- Stewart Brodie Software Engineer ANT Software Limited
Received on Wednesday, 12 July 2006 11:37:38 UTC