- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 22:15:09 +0100
- To: www-style@w3.org
Garrett Smith wrote: > http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-selectors/ > > E:empty - an E element that has no children (including text nodes) > > If you really want to include text nodes, the definition must be changed. > > E:empty - a node E that has no children (including text nodes). > > The error is that text nodes are not elements nodes. e.g. a text node > cannot be element E because a text node is not an element. But, unless I'm mistaken, it's not the intention here to include text nodes in the :empty definition. The "including text nodes" refers to the "children", not the "E element". So there really isn't any error here. P -- Patrick H. Lauke __________________________________________________________ re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively [latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.] www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk http://redux.deviantart.com __________________________________________________________ Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force http://webstandards.org/ __________________________________________________________
Received on Monday, 10 July 2006 21:15:14 UTC