- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2006 23:39:43 +0100
- To: Craig Francis <craig@synergycms.com>
- CC: www-style@w3.org
Craig Francis wrote: > > I have recently been thinking about how search engine spiders index a > website. > > At the moment we can provide ways for the spiders to find the page, but > I do not think its possible for us to tell the spider things like where > the navigation bar is (as I think it should be indexed differently to > the main content of the page). > > I have written a fairly small document explaining how a future version > of CSS could help present the documents structure and data to search > engine spiders in a better way than their current guesswork methods. > > It would be great if you can give me some feedback. > > http://www.krang.org.uk/searchEngineCSS/ You're proposing the use of CSS to impart semantic meaning (e.g. content: keywords and importance: 1) and behaviour (e.g. links: ignore)? Sorry, but this is certainly beyond the scope of what CSS should do. And no, the speech output CSS rules are not comparable: they define how something should be presented, aurally...not what the meaning or behaviour are. P -- Patrick H. Lauke __________________________________________________________ re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively [latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.] www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk http://redux.deviantart.com __________________________________________________________ Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force http://webstandards.org/ __________________________________________________________
Received on Wednesday, 5 July 2006 22:39:59 UTC