- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 14:44:16 -0800
- To: "C. M. Sperberg-McQueen" <cmsmcq@acm.org>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 26 January 2006 22:44:32 UTC
On Thursday 2006-01-26 15:28 -0700, C. M. Sperberg-McQueen wrote: > We would also like to draw your attention to the opening > paragraph of the abstract in that draft. It says, in part: > > Selectors have been optimized for use with HTML and XML, and > are designed to be usable in performance-critical code. > > We object to the characterization expressed in the above > sentence. It could be construed as implying that CSS selectors > are somehow superior to all other forms of selection in terms of > performance. There is nothing in the specification to support > this claim. It appears to have been added solely for effect. > Please remove. I would object to removing this without an appropriate replacement. I suggest the following: Selectors have been optimized for testing a single HTML or XML element against a set of selectors rather than testing a single selector against a set of elements; this type of use is expected to be usable in performance-critical code, even when performed frequently. -David -- L. David Baron <URL: http://dbaron.org/ > Technical Lead, Layout & CSS, Mozilla Corporation
Received on Thursday, 26 January 2006 22:44:32 UTC