Re: Question about linking CSS to XML vocabularies

On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 12:56:09PM +0100, Daniel Glazman wrote:
> There is a difference only because we are, nowadays, unable to
> declaratively express the semantics attached to an element or an
> attribute and link it to the document instance. Solve that issue
> and you can get rid of my "visually" above.

What's the point of having arbitrary XML with a separate language for
describing its semantics?

You end up with the old <tag semantics="foo"><tag semantics="bar"
/></tag> instead of <foo><bar /></foo> situation.

"foo", "bar", etc still have to be defined somewhere.

-- 
David Dorward                                      http://dorward.me.uk

Received on Saturday, 30 December 2006 11:59:41 UTC