- From: Laurens Holst <lholst@students.cs.uu.nl>
- Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 12:26:14 +0200
- To: Simon Pieters <zcorpan@hotmail.com>
- Cc: bert@w3.org, www-style@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 25 April 2006 10:26:30 UTC
Simon Pieters schreef:
> I think that the following should be equivalent:
>
> H1 { content: url(sparkly_heading_text.png); }
> H1 { content: url(sparkly_heading_text.png), contents; }
>
> ...because I think that authors will use the first example and expect
> the contents to be used as a fallback. Many authors don't test to
> disable images so they won't realise that the contents aren't used as
> a fallback, and thus the contents won't be accessible to some users.
I second that.
~Grauw
--
Ushiko-san! Kimi wa doushite, Ushiko-san!!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Laurens Holst, student, university of Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Website: www.grauw.nl. Backbase employee; www.backbase.com.
Received on Tuesday, 25 April 2006 10:26:30 UTC