- From: Laurens Holst <lholst@students.cs.uu.nl>
- Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 12:26:14 +0200
- To: Simon Pieters <zcorpan@hotmail.com>
- Cc: bert@w3.org, www-style@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 25 April 2006 10:26:30 UTC
Simon Pieters schreef: > I think that the following should be equivalent: > > H1 { content: url(sparkly_heading_text.png); } > H1 { content: url(sparkly_heading_text.png), contents; } > > ...because I think that authors will use the first example and expect > the contents to be used as a fallback. Many authors don't test to > disable images so they won't realise that the contents aren't used as > a fallback, and thus the contents won't be accessible to some users. I second that. ~Grauw -- Ushiko-san! Kimi wa doushite, Ushiko-san!! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Laurens Holst, student, university of Utrecht, the Netherlands. Website: www.grauw.nl. Backbase employee; www.backbase.com.
Received on Tuesday, 25 April 2006 10:26:30 UTC