- From: Laurens Holst <lholst@students.cs.uu.nl>
 - Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 12:26:14 +0200
 - To: Simon Pieters <zcorpan@hotmail.com>
 - Cc: bert@w3.org, www-style@w3.org
 
Received on Tuesday, 25 April 2006 10:26:30 UTC
Simon Pieters schreef:
> I think that the following should be equivalent:
>
>   H1 { content: url(sparkly_heading_text.png); }
>   H1 { content: url(sparkly_heading_text.png), contents; }
>
> ...because I think that authors will use the first example and expect 
> the contents to be used as a fallback. Many authors don't test to 
> disable images so they won't realise that the contents aren't used as 
> a fallback, and thus the contents won't be accessible to some users. 
I second that.
~Grauw
-- 
Ushiko-san! Kimi wa doushite, Ushiko-san!!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Laurens Holst, student, university of Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Website: www.grauw.nl. Backbase employee; www.backbase.com.
Received on Tuesday, 25 April 2006 10:26:30 UTC