- From: Jens Meiert <jens.meiert@erde3.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 14:49:23 +0200 (MEST)
- To: "Kornel Lesinski" <kornel@osiolki.net>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
> > They work in IE, but they're not valid...hence the validator is > > behaving correctly. "Clearly work" does not necessarily mean valid. > > Maybe validator could be extended to add such description when > reporting error? (same for behavior, filter, -moz-, -o-, etc.) The validator aims to look for specification compliance, at least this is what it should do. Though proprietary extensions are generally allowed [1], they are not part of the specification, so the validator would then only check for correct syntax. Also, how would you decide what proprietary properties to be added? Only Gecko supported properties using the "-moz-" prefix? Gecko and Microsoft properties? Others as well? Where to get the information on changes and additions? [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/syndata.html#q4 -- Jens Meiert Information Architect http://meiert.com/
Received on Tuesday, 11 October 2005 12:49:45 UTC