- From: Steve Zilles <szilles@adobe.com>
- Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2005 22:37:20 -0700
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, www-style@w3.org, w3c-css-wg@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 4 October 2005 05:41:19 UTC
At 08:17 PM 10/3/2005, Ian Hickson wrote: >On Mon, 3 Oct 2005, Steve Zilles wrote: > > > > > > It seems to me that we really should rescind CSS2 > > > > There is only one large problem with this view. Major parts of the CSS2 REC > > are normatively referenced by the XSL 1.0 REC > >Actually XSL's reference to CSS2 is not a normative reference: > > http://www.w3.org/TR/xsl/sliceD.html#section-N85770-Other-References I cannot speak for the references section, but the normative text does refer to CSS2. See for example Section 7.1 http://www.w3.org/TR/xsl/slice7.html#pr-section which says the properties a copied from CSS2 and that the CSS2 Errata apply. >-- >Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL >http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. >Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.' Steve ===================================== Steve Zilles 115 Lansberry Court, Los Gatos, CA 95032-4710 steve@zilles.org
Received on Tuesday, 4 October 2005 05:41:19 UTC