- From: Anne van Kesteren <fora@annevankesteren.nl>
- Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2005 09:40:29 +0200
- To: Dimitri Glazkov <dimitri.glazkov@gmail.com>
- Cc: Andrew Fedoniouk <news@terrainformatica.com>, Robert Koberg <rob@koberg.com>, www-style@w3.org
Quoting Dimitri Glazkov <dimitri.glazkov@gmail.com>: > Hear, hear. I've raised the same point at the WhatWg list -- in the > contentEditable method, some of the semantics are just plain missing > from the markup -- there is nothing that indicates how the data is > supposed to end up back on the server. When you are building applications you need script anyway. For most things with regard to contentEditable it is almost like a requirement. Therefore having some additional native markup just for submission does not really make sense. Note that requiring scripting for applications should not really be an issue. I suggest we await some implementation feedback from other browser vendors and eventually from developers who have actually used it. What I have heard so far about contentEditable from people using it to build applications with is not that they want to have native submission controls. They would like more control than they can get in Internet Explorer and less to clean up. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/>
Received on Sunday, 2 October 2005 07:40:33 UTC