- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 12:47:20 -0800
- To: Andrew Fedoniouk <news@terrainformatica.com>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 23 November 2005 20:51:04 UTC
On Wednesday 2005-11-23 12:22 -0800, Andrew Fedoniouk wrote: > Can we remove mentioning of any UA specific pre- and post- > style processing procedures from the spec? > > In particular items: > > > 1. UA stylesheet > > 2. non-HTML presentational attributes > > and > > > 11. UA stylesheet !important, sorted by specificity and then order > > ? > > as it is really up to UA how to set initial values of styles and > how to implement fixup procedures. > It is enough to say that UA is in its rights to implement these > functions in its own way and this process is *completely unrelated* > to style cascading, specificity and order - scope of the spec per se. > > Why we need these UA implementation details there? We need it because it limits what a conformant UA can do. If we didn't have that limitation then a UA could do anything and claim that it was still conformant, but that the "bug" was due to the behavior of its UA stylesheet. -David -- L. David Baron <URL: http://dbaron.org/ > Technical Lead, Layout & CSS, Mozilla Corporation
Received on Wednesday, 23 November 2005 20:51:04 UTC