- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 12:47:20 -0800
- To: Andrew Fedoniouk <news@terrainformatica.com>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 23 November 2005 20:51:04 UTC
On Wednesday 2005-11-23 12:22 -0800, Andrew Fedoniouk wrote:
> Can we remove mentioning of any UA specific pre- and post-
> style processing procedures from the spec?
>
> In particular items:
>
> > 1. UA stylesheet
> > 2. non-HTML presentational attributes
>
> and
>
> > 11. UA stylesheet !important, sorted by specificity and then order
>
> ?
>
> as it is really up to UA how to set initial values of styles and
> how to implement fixup procedures.
> It is enough to say that UA is in its rights to implement these
> functions in its own way and this process is *completely unrelated*
> to style cascading, specificity and order - scope of the spec per se.
>
> Why we need these UA implementation details there?
We need it because it limits what a conformant UA can do. If we didn't
have that limitation then a UA could do anything and claim that it was
still conformant, but that the "bug" was due to the behavior of its UA
stylesheet.
-David
--
L. David Baron <URL: http://dbaron.org/ >
Technical Lead, Layout & CSS, Mozilla Corporation
Received on Wednesday, 23 November 2005 20:51:04 UTC