- From: David Balch <david.balch@continuing-education.oxford.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 16:12:27 +0100
- To: 'Ben Ward' <benmward@gmail.com>, W3C Style List <www-style@w3.org>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ben Ward [mailto:benmward@gmail.com]
> Sent: 23 May 2005 15:39
>
> Your reference [0] states "To obtain other glyphs, authors
> should use the 'content' property of the ::marker
> pseudo-element". This is the preferred way of having your own
> customised glyphs for bullet markers, and is obviously
> completely flexible for authors to use whatever character they wish.
>
> The named glyphs are a convenience and obviously easier to
> learn than adding character codes, but they're somewhat rigid
> and ::marker {
> content: 'blah'; } overcomes this.
>
> In the case of your request, you'd want a style looking like this:
>
> li::marker
> {
> content: '\2717'
> }
Yeah, I see that this is possible, and also perceive the named glyphs as a
convenience. It seems to me that, with "check" as a named glyph, "cross" (or
something to that effect) would be a logical and useful companion - whether
it's useful enough to include I leave to the list...
Cheers,
Dave.
>
> Ben
>
> On 5/23/05, David Balch
> <david.balch@continuing-education.oxford.ac.uk> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've searched the list archive for this and couldn't find anything,
> > but apologies if it has already been dealt with...
> >
> > The CSS3 lists module includes a <glyph> value for the
> 'list-style-type'
> > property [0].
> >
> > <glyph> defines 7 glyph styles, including "check". It
> strikes me that
> > another "cross" glyph would be a natural companion to
> check, e.g. both
> > might be used in lists discussing the pros and cons of something.
> >
> > If I've understood the Unicode properly [1], Unicode hex
> 2717 (BALLOT
> > X) might be a suitable example character.
> >
> > [0] http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-css3-lists-20021107/#ltglyphgt
> > [1]
> http://www.unicode.org/Public/MAPPINGS/VENDORS/ADOBE/zdingbat.txt
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Dave.
> >
> > --
> > David Balch. | Web developer.
> > T: +44 (0)1865 280979 | Technology-Assisted Lifelong Learning.
> > F: +44 (0)1865 280982 | University of Oxford.
> > E: david.balch@conted.ox.ac.uk
> >
> > TALL, OUDCE and the University of Oxford accept no legal
> > responsibility for the contents of this message. Any views
> or opinions
> > presented are only those of the author and not those of
> TALL, or OUDCE, or the University of Oxford.
> > If this email has come to you in error please delete it and any
> > attachments
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> http://www.ben-ward.co.uk
>
>
> --
> http://www.ben-ward.co.uk
>
Received on Monday, 23 May 2005 15:12:39 UTC