- From: David Balch <david.balch@continuing-education.oxford.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 16:12:27 +0100
- To: 'Ben Ward' <benmward@gmail.com>, W3C Style List <www-style@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: Ben Ward [mailto:benmward@gmail.com] > Sent: 23 May 2005 15:39 > > Your reference [0] states "To obtain other glyphs, authors > should use the 'content' property of the ::marker > pseudo-element". This is the preferred way of having your own > customised glyphs for bullet markers, and is obviously > completely flexible for authors to use whatever character they wish. > > The named glyphs are a convenience and obviously easier to > learn than adding character codes, but they're somewhat rigid > and ::marker { > content: 'blah'; } overcomes this. > > In the case of your request, you'd want a style looking like this: > > li::marker > { > content: '\2717' > } Yeah, I see that this is possible, and also perceive the named glyphs as a convenience. It seems to me that, with "check" as a named glyph, "cross" (or something to that effect) would be a logical and useful companion - whether it's useful enough to include I leave to the list... Cheers, Dave. > > Ben > > On 5/23/05, David Balch > <david.balch@continuing-education.oxford.ac.uk> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I've searched the list archive for this and couldn't find anything, > > but apologies if it has already been dealt with... > > > > The CSS3 lists module includes a <glyph> value for the > 'list-style-type' > > property [0]. > > > > <glyph> defines 7 glyph styles, including "check". It > strikes me that > > another "cross" glyph would be a natural companion to > check, e.g. both > > might be used in lists discussing the pros and cons of something. > > > > If I've understood the Unicode properly [1], Unicode hex > 2717 (BALLOT > > X) might be a suitable example character. > > > > [0] http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-css3-lists-20021107/#ltglyphgt > > [1] > http://www.unicode.org/Public/MAPPINGS/VENDORS/ADOBE/zdingbat.txt > > > > Cheers, > > Dave. > > > > -- > > David Balch. | Web developer. > > T: +44 (0)1865 280979 | Technology-Assisted Lifelong Learning. > > F: +44 (0)1865 280982 | University of Oxford. > > E: david.balch@conted.ox.ac.uk > > > > TALL, OUDCE and the University of Oxford accept no legal > > responsibility for the contents of this message. Any views > or opinions > > presented are only those of the author and not those of > TALL, or OUDCE, or the University of Oxford. > > If this email has come to you in error please delete it and any > > attachments > > > > > > > > > -- > http://www.ben-ward.co.uk > > > -- > http://www.ben-ward.co.uk >
Received on Monday, 23 May 2005 15:12:39 UTC