- From: Junzo IKUTA <ikuta.junzo@jp.panasonic.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 09:21:46 +0900
- To: www-style@w3.org
Sorry, probably I've mis-read the spec for this point. (I think I've read "Introduction to CSS3", http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/WD-css3-roadmap-20010523/ and in 3.6 Box model, I've followed "11. Visual effects", http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/visufx.html and thus gone to CSS2.0... ) Junzo IKUTA <ikuta.junzo@jp.panasonic.com> On Thu, 19 May 2005 12:09:53 -0700 "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote: > On Thursday 2005-05-19 09:12 -0600, Bigelow, Jim (LaserJet Firmware) wrote: > > > e-4) visibility > > > Inheritance of visibility is: > > > CSS2: no > > > CSS2.1: yes > > > CSS3: no > > > Although its not the conflict in CSS Print, but what spec must we > > > follow? As CSS2.1 says, inherited:yes??? > > Which css3 draft has it wrong? > http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-css3-box-20021024/#the-visibility says it > is inherited, but I wouldn't be surprised if the property ended up in > more than one module. > > -David > > -- > L. David Baron <URL: http://dbaron.org/ > > Technical Lead, Layout & CSS, The Mozilla Foundation
Received on Friday, 20 May 2005 02:47:25 UTC