- From: Mikko Rantalainen <mikko.rantalainen@peda.net>
- Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 15:30:25 +0300
- To: www-style@w3.org
Hans Meiser wrote:
>>From: Mikko Rantalainen <mikko.rantalainen@peda.net>
>>I repeat my question:
>>
>>>p { color: span.color; }
>>>.special+p {color: blue; }
>>>span { color: p.color; }
>>
>>given source fragment
>>
>><div>
>><p class="special>A</p>
>><p><span>B</span></p>
>></div>
>>
>>What is the computed 'color' value for <span> (the string "B")? Let's say
>>we have also rule "div { color: red; }" if that makes any difference.
>
>
> According to the example above, the following would apply:
>
> p { color: span.color; } /* forward-reference - ignored */
> span { color: p.color; } /* ignored because not given */
>
> So only the following CSS rules would apply:
>
> .special+p ー color ー blue
> .div ー color ー red
Seems pretty limited to me. Is this any better than a single-pass
precompiler?
In addition, you'll run into problems because you decided to use CSS
selector as a key to reference to. For example:
serif, fantasy /* elements 'serif' and 'fantasy' */
{
font: "Arial Unicode MS" 1em;
}
fantasy.font /* special class here */
{
font: "Garamond" 1em;
}
.myspecialclass
{
font: serif, fantasy.font; /* is this replaced? */
}
Or
p
{
color: blue;
}
html:nth-of-type(1) > head + body div > table td > p
{
color: red;
}
html:nth-of-type(1) > head + body div > table td > ul > li
{
color: html:nth-of-type(1) > head + body div > table td > p.color;
/* is this supposed to work to get red instead of blue? */
}
It may be pretty easy to implement but if it has no power over a
single-pass precompiler, it's not worth it.
--
Mikko
Received on Thursday, 19 May 2005 12:30:35 UTC