- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 20:29:35 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Tue, 17 May 2005, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
>
> S is currently defined as:
>
> s [ \t\r\n\f]
> {s}+ {return S;}
>
> Should the definition of "s" also include '\v'?
I'd rather we removed \f, personally... Why would it include \v,
particularly?
--
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 17 May 2005 21:59:03 UTC