- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 15:24:57 +0200
- To: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Monday, May 9, 2005, 9:26:30 PM, David wrote: >> If there had been a fragment part, I believe that it would have been DW> Fragments are not part of URIs but only part of URI references. data DW> URIs are URIs, not URI references. Yes, I was well aware of that and alluded to it below, when discussing RFC 2396; however my main discussion was in terms of RFC 3986 where a fragment is, indeed, part of a URI. >>From RFC 2396: (Which is obsoleted by RFC 3986) -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Chair, W3C SVG Working Group W3C Graphics Activity Lead
Received on Wednesday, 11 May 2005 13:25:06 UTC