- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 4 May 2005 23:10:54 +0200
- To: Bert Bos <bert@w3.org>
- Cc: Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com>, www-style@w3.org, public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
On Wednesday, April 27, 2005, 10:08:09 PM, Bert wrote: BB> On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 03:31:21PM -0400, Paul Grosso wrote: >> Specifically, would it make sense for the CSS specification >> to state explicitly that attributes named xml:id will be >> treated as IDs when styling XML documents? Yes, clearly that bit of direction would be helpful. BB> I think it is better to keep the language abstract, I fail to understand the phobia that seems to exist about mentioning the XML specifications. Is CSS supposed to handle XML, or not? BB> because there are no XML formats that allow xml:id yet, This is clearly untrue. BB> let alone formats that are supported by CSS UAs, Also untrue, as Paul already mentioned BB> so we won't be able to test such a statement. Clearly false, as Anne already made some test cases and there are already implementations that pass them. BB> And that would keep CSS 2.1 from exiting CR. No, it wouldn't. So, please add specific language to CSS 2.1 to state explicitly that xml:id is treated as ID for the purpose of the # selector. Preferably before last call, although I can send in a last call comment if you would prefer. -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Chair, W3C SVG Working Group W3C Graphics Activity Lead
Received on Wednesday, 4 May 2005 21:11:38 UTC