- From: Laurens Holst <lholst@students.cs.uu.nl>
- Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 15:50:55 +0100
- To: Anne van Kesteren <fora@annevankesteren.nl>, www-style@w3.org
Anne van Kesteren wrote: >> :or(body, section, navigation):depth(3) h >> >> Actually, :or has an even stronger use case here than :depth... > > I wonder how :or fits in with existing pseudo-classes (selecting an > element based on a particular conditation). I am not proposing a specific syntax :). >> :depth is pretty much already possible, although with limitations. You >> can write ul ul ul ul to target fourth-level (and deeper) unordered >> lists. It can be pretty compact even :), although it does of course not >> allow infinite nesting like depth does (but in reality, you never need >> that). > > You don't? The indenting would kill me ;p. Seriously, if you look at heading levels (1...6) or nested lists, any real-world document I have made so far never reached ‘level 6’... (And when you use descendant selectors, any deeper levels would not be unstyled, just styled the same as level 6). ~Grauw -- Ushiko-san! Kimi wa doushite, Ushiko-san nan da!!
Received on Monday, 21 March 2005 15:06:40 UTC