- From: Orion Adrian <orion.adrian@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2005 18:03:26 -0400
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 7/1/05, David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk> wrote: > > > model is quite humorous. Again I'll stress that the people on the other > > side of the screen don't care how the web-site works as long as it works. > > And, unfortunately, often neither do the people paying the money, as > long as the page looks almost exactly as they want it to look, when > accessed using out of the box copies (i.e. no assisitive technology, > no accessibility features turned, no tightening of security) of > browsers that correctly use the User Agent string in somewhere between > in excess of 80% and in excess of 90% of the hits in their web site > logs (regardless that some browsers might cache better, and some > browsers forge the User Agent string because of discrimination against > minority browsers). > Again, if you want someone to do something make it easy and profitable (if money is involved). If the computer can do it, let it. Let's find a way for computers to do the accessibility and portability work for us. Expecting the content author so far hasn't been too successful. Orion Adrian
Received on Saturday, 2 July 2005 02:10:27 UTC