Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS

Anne van Kesteren wrote:

>> I think that ::nth-last-child() should have never been added, it’s 
>> not very useful anyway :).
>
> Where is that pseudo-element defined? AFAIK, there is only a 
> pseudo-class with a similar name, but different syntax.

I of course meant :nth-last-child(), but I was not paying attention and 
responding to a similar writing of the pseudo-class :).


~Grauw

-- 
Ushiko-san! Kimi wa doushite, Ushiko-san!!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Laurens Holst, student, university of Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Website: www.grauw.nl. Backbase employee; www.backbase.com.

Received on Friday, 1 July 2005 12:15:48 UTC