- From: Laurens Holst <lholst@students.cs.uu.nl>
- Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2005 14:15:47 +0200
- To: Anne van Kesteren <fora@annevankesteren.nl>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
Anne van Kesteren wrote: >> I think that ::nth-last-child() should have never been added, it’s >> not very useful anyway :). > > Where is that pseudo-element defined? AFAIK, there is only a > pseudo-class with a similar name, but different syntax. I of course meant :nth-last-child(), but I was not paying attention and responding to a similar writing of the pseudo-class :). ~Grauw -- Ushiko-san! Kimi wa doushite, Ushiko-san!! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Laurens Holst, student, university of Utrecht, the Netherlands. Website: www.grauw.nl. Backbase employee; www.backbase.com.
Received on Friday, 1 July 2005 12:15:48 UTC