- From: Bert Bos <bert@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 20:18:55 +0100
- To: W3C CSS List <www-style@w3.org>
On Wednesday 16 February 2005 20:29, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > Why does "Previous version" not mention: > <http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-css3-border-20021107/>? Because nobody thought about it :-( I'll add it in the next version. > > Also there is a lot of red in the draft and no clear reason why the > separate background and border module had to be merged. Because 'border-image' also creates a background, and because for many designers, it seems, borders and backgrounds belong together: what looks like a border, can actually be made up of images that are backgrounds in CSS terms. > > The abstract also still refers to CSS 2.0 instead of CSS 2.1. Was > that intended? Yes, while CSS 2.1 is not a Recommendation yet. > > The lack of subsections in the draft makes it quite hard to read. I'm open for suggestions. Bert -- Bert Bos ( W 3 C ) http://www.w3.org/ http://www.w3.org/people/bos W3C/ERCIM bert@w3.org 2004 Rt des Lucioles / BP 93 +33 (0)4 92 38 76 92 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
Received on Thursday, 24 February 2005 19:19:05 UTC