- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 23:10:31 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Staffan Måhlén <staffan.mahlen@comhem.se>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 22 February 2005 23:10:36 UTC
On Wed, 9 Feb 2005, Staffan Måhlén wrote: > > I was trying to say that i don't think 'list-item' is a real 'display' > value, its just a block with a marker. The marker "should" work even if > the element was inline or something else, while 'list-style-position' > might not apply to all 'display' types. > > I think this is probably what you were referring to in your post: Right. That's one of the things the working group is considering -- a way of saying "this element should have a list item marker" instead of "this element is of 'display: list-item'". > > el { display: inline; annotate: list-marker; } > > el::marker { ... } > > I don't have any idea how 'list-style-type' would work with something > like your annotate-marker though. It would set the default value for the style in the 'counter' function on the 'content' property of the ::marker pseudo-element, or similar. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 22 February 2005 23:10:36 UTC