W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2005

Re: [css3-background], comments on 'box-shadow'

From: Philip TAYLOR <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 18:56:43 +0000
Message-ID: <4214E8EB.5030803@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
To: Andrew Fedoniouk <news@terrainformatica.com>
CC: www-style@w3.org

Andrew Fedoniouk wrote:


 > Conclusion #1: Having border-image feature  implemented, shadows will be
 > rendered using border images in most of the cases.


 > There are many ways to draw antialiased lines and curves.
 > Professional web design will never rely on them. Border images
 > will be used instead.
 > For me 'box-shadow' and 'border-radius' and the way they are defined
 > looks like a naive attempt to provide a "cool features" which will be
 > used only by "naive designers". Real professionals will never use them.

And so "real professionals" will continue to produce image- (and hence
bandwidth/download-time) intensive pages which annoy the hell out
of most of us, whilst the non-professionals will continue to produce
lightweight, effective, pages that load in a fraction of the time,
look /almost/ as good, and deliver the message.  So be it.  Sounds
just fine to me.

Philip Taylor
Received on Thursday, 17 February 2005 18:59:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:27:17 UTC