- From: Anne van Kesteren <fora@annevankesteren.nl>
- Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 13:54:27 +0100
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- CC: W3C CSS List <www-style@w3.org>
Ian Hickson wrote: > On Thu, 10 Feb 2005, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > >> (I believe there are @canvas or similar proposals out there, they >> just haven't been published yet in official drafts.) > > Actually at the moment there are no outstanding proposals for > @canvas; all the use cases have been handled by special-casing the > root element. (In particular, background on the root element, and > 'overflow' on the root element to do scrollbars.) So CSS 2.1 is changed again for XML documents? Is it going back to WD? Because currently it reads[1]: # HTML UAs may apply the overflow property from the BODY or HTML # elements to the viewport. CSS 3 does not mention any of this[2]. To be clear, this testcase is now INVALID: <http://annevankesteren.nl/test/css/p/overflow/xhtml-html.xml> ...? [1]<http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/CR-CSS21-20040225/visufx.html#propdef-overflow> [2]<http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-css3-box-20021024/#overflow> -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/>
Received on Thursday, 10 February 2005 12:54:54 UTC