- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 13:29:04 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Staffan Måhlén <staffan.mahlen@comhem.se>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 9 February 2005 13:29:09 UTC
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005, [ISO-8859-1] Staffan Måhlén wrote: > > Ok, so we've got 'inline-block' and 'inline-table'. The 'run-in' depends > on following content, but why is there no 'inline-list-item'? CSS3 probably will. It's on the working group's agenda. > (IMHO the marker should not be 'display' dependant at all of course). Not sure what you mean here. > To me it would have made sense to have only block-context-participating > tables, and if you really really wanted a table in a line, put it inside > an 'inline-block' now that they are available. Retrospectively that might make sense, but inline-table came first. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 9 February 2005 13:29:09 UTC