- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 17:34:07 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Adam Kuehn <akuehn@nc.rr.com>
- Cc: Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>, www-style@w3.org
On Thu, 29 Dec 2005, Adam Kuehn wrote: > > I understood the purpose for the word, but the formatting implies that > the normative text can be understood even if one fails to read the > notes. That is not true in the presence of the deductive conjunction. > In my view, the deductive step is clear enough without the "therefore", > and the presence of that word creates an inappropriate dependency on the > non-normative text. I would still remove it. Unfortunately, in this case the current wording is the result of a long and painful discussion within the working group and I do not think I will be able to convince the other members of the group to change the text at this time. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Thursday, 29 December 2005 17:34:47 UTC