- From: Orion Adrian <orion.adrian@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 19:19:23 -0400
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 8/26/05, L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote: > On Friday 2005-08-26 19:02 -0400, Orion Adrian wrote: > > On 8/26/05, L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote: > > > Perhaps, but I don't think that the work to maintain the duplicate > > > copies of the examples is worth the work given that testing should be > > > done with the test suite. > > > > I for one can tell you it would be very useful to me. > > But is that worth developing CSS specifications at 90% the rate they > would otherwise be developed? 75%? 50%? In the case of CSS2.1, I > think it actually might be less than 50%, considering the current stage > of development. I think a lot of people can't comprehend how having someone provide containers for the templates and provide them for linking could possibly take up 50% of the CSS2.1 WG's time. Might it slow do that for one or two people? Yeah I could see that. I do understand the importance for precision here and the difficulty. I will ask for one thing. How many man-hours a week are spent on CSS 2.1? I don't need anything approaching precision in the answer, but is it 10? 50? 100? -- Orion Adrian
Received on Friday, 26 August 2005 23:19:26 UTC