- From: Malcolm Rowe <malcolm-www-style@farside.org.uk>
- Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 16:32:40 +0100
- To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 03:39:55PM +0200, Chris Lilley wrote: > The abstract says that CSS 2.1 is for "to structured documents (e.g., > HTML documents and XML applications)" but then removes items (relative > to CSS2.0) such as @font-face because they have not been implemented in > HTML browsers, regardless of whether they have been implemented with XML > applications. Speaking only for myself, I can't see that CSS 2.1 provides any specific information as to why @font-face was removed, other than the general statement that the specification "consists of all CSS features that are implemented interoperably". Or are you saying that we already have two interoperable XML user agents that support @font-face? Regards, Malcolm
Received on Thursday, 25 August 2005 15:32:44 UTC