- From: Laurens Holst <lholst@students.cs.uu.nl>
- Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 23:43:39 +0200
- To: Slalomsk8er <slalomsk8er@solnet.ch>
- CC: www-style@w3.org
Slalomsk8er wrote: > I don't think this is needed as the background-colors default is > |transparent so it will look like a "normal" box but if you are a > webmaster and do a gradient not from or to transparent, then I hope you > did set a |background-color like Ben wrote. But where is the problem? As > long as the content can be read and the page does not look like in a > candyshop (this can happen with background-color-gradient-to:) it does > not bother me. > > With background-color: blue; background-color-gradient-to: top-bottom > red; how can I get it to look clean (background-color: |transparent;|) > if the browser fails know the gradient? It is a design nightmare if the > background-color is always part of the gradient! > Hmm, well ok I guess. It was just a thought :). I don’t really believe just letting the CSS spec or common sense ‘require’ a fallback to be specified will be sufficient, so that’s why I was looking for something more ‘automatic’. After all, look how many websites specify foreground colours without specifying background colours (assuming the browser’s default white one)? Emrah BASKAYA wrote: >> background-color-gradient-to: top-bottom red; > I still prefer the degree solution, which I have detailed (and no-one > seems to be bothered with it!) Of course the ‘top-bottom’ keyword can be replaced with 90deg or something... I saw the image (cool), didn’t notice the actual text on it though :). Anyways, I think it kinda looks similar to gradient() mentioned earlier, doesn’t it? Anyways... ~Grauw -- Ushiko-san! Kimi wa doushite, Ushiko-san!! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Laurens Holst, student, university of Utrecht, the Netherlands. Website: www.grauw.nl. Backbase employee; www.backbase.com.
Received on Monday, 15 August 2005 21:44:00 UTC