- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2005 17:03:53 +0200
- To: Laurens Holst <lholst@students.cs.uu.nl>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
* Laurens Holst wrote: >Werner Donné wrote: >> I would welcome XPath in CSS, but then the XPath specification >> should introduce the notion of specificity, otherwise the cascading >> mechanism can't work. Look at how XSLT works around that problem >> to see how valuable cascading is. In XSLT you have a different problem as templates cannot easily be merged. CSS declarations on the other hand can easily be merged. >The problem with XPath in selectors is that you cannot determine their >outcome in O(1) or a reasonable O(n) case. With the amount of elements >documents can have, this could very quickly result in unacceptable >browser rendering times. That depends... Again, the case is rather made that dynamically re- evaluating them might have negative impact on resources and certain expressions don't play well with progressive rendering (and further that this is more important for constrained devices). >Imagine the case where you have just one style rule which has an >//div[1]/following-sibling::*//input selector. When for every element in >the document tree that rule is evaluated, perhaps you can see why that >would be undesireable. Obviously as more style rules like this are >added, the case becomes worse. The first thing to note would be that matching the XPath expression is no different from matching the |input selector for all non-input elements. And the CSS selector '|div:first-of-type ~ * |input' you might use instead (they are of course not identical) has similar "poor" performance. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Sunday, 10 April 2005 15:03:32 UTC