- From: Orion Adrian <orion.adrian@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 09:40:01 -0400
- To: www-style@w3.org
Honestly given the speed of most computers these days and the need for some sort of transformation as a step to styling I think using XPath would not be a terrible idea. I know this has been brought up before. Perhaps it's best to start thinking of CSS as a server side technology as well. That way you get around the issues of performance on slower devices (handhelds, etc). Orion Adrian On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 10:08:52 +0200 (MEST), Jens Meiert <jens.meiert@erde3.com> wrote: > > (Had problems with mail delivery, so apologies if there already was an > appropriate reply.) > > > > In the CSS, I could define a different background to those <li>s, > > > where is a child <ul>. I don't have any idea, how to specify it > > > in the CSS, but I think it's usefull. > > This has already been proposed [1] and already been answered [2], maybe even > several times. If added to the specification, you could solve the problem > e.g. via "li:has(li > ul)". > > Regards, > Jens. > > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2004Jan/0226.html > [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2004Jan/0237.html > > -- > Jens Meiert > Interface Architect (IxD) > > http://meiert.com/ > >
Received on Friday, 17 September 2004 13:40:04 UTC