- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 00:17:29 -0700
- To: www-style@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 14 September 2004 07:18:03 UTC
On Tuesday 2004-09-14 09:12 +0200, Jens Meiert wrote: > Nonetheless, this "lapsus" seems avoidable if the CSS 2.1 spec was in line > with the other recommendations [2-4] -- namely illustrationg the specificity > via e.g. "100" instead of "0,1,0,0". That was an editorial improvement intended to make the text easier to understand, I believe. Note that CSS 2.1 is the newest spec, and the editorial changes in CSS 2.1 will hopefully appear in the next public version css3-selectors. -David -- L. David Baron <URL: http://dbaron.org/ >
Received on Tuesday, 14 September 2004 07:18:03 UTC