- From: csant <csant@csant.info>
- Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 10:45:14 +0200
- To: "www-style.w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
> Given the following hypothetical CSS3:
> body { background: url(foo) url(bar); }
> Which background is painted on the bottom, and which is painted on the
> top?
As Lachlan Hunt pointed out already, a delimiter might be necessary - but
I would disagree on his choice for "|".
> Should the syntax be like that, or would something else be better?
> body { background: url(foo), url(bar); }
As in the 'content' property, this would rather tell us an alternate
background image that could be used in case the first option is not
available or not supported;
> body { background: url(foo) | url(bar); }
this option seems rather to suggest an image *or* the other one - a nice
idea to allow random background images;
> body { background: url(foo) and url(bar); }
finally, this looks to me like the best option, and it could be expanded
as Lachlan Hunt suggested:
body { background: url(foo) top left no-repeat fixed and
url(bar) top right repeat-y scroll; }
Might this be a way that could be used in a future audio module to allow
for playlists on background sounds (play-during) as well?
body { background-sound: url(foo) and url(bar) }
as opposed to
body { background-sound: url(foo), url(bar) }
to allow for alternate audio formats: playing the first supported one?
Regards,
/csant
--
[Quote]
And she, remembering other things, to me trifles but torturing to her,
showed me how life withers when there are things we cannot share.
~~~ Virginia Woolf
Received on Thursday, 28 October 2004 08:45:23 UTC