- From: csant <csant@csant.info>
- Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 10:45:14 +0200
- To: "www-style.w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
> Given the following hypothetical CSS3: > body { background: url(foo) url(bar); } > Which background is painted on the bottom, and which is painted on the > top? As Lachlan Hunt pointed out already, a delimiter might be necessary - but I would disagree on his choice for "|". > Should the syntax be like that, or would something else be better? > body { background: url(foo), url(bar); } As in the 'content' property, this would rather tell us an alternate background image that could be used in case the first option is not available or not supported; > body { background: url(foo) | url(bar); } this option seems rather to suggest an image *or* the other one - a nice idea to allow random background images; > body { background: url(foo) and url(bar); } finally, this looks to me like the best option, and it could be expanded as Lachlan Hunt suggested: body { background: url(foo) top left no-repeat fixed and url(bar) top right repeat-y scroll; } Might this be a way that could be used in a future audio module to allow for playlists on background sounds (play-during) as well? body { background-sound: url(foo) and url(bar) } as opposed to body { background-sound: url(foo), url(bar) } to allow for alternate audio formats: playing the first supported one? Regards, /csant -- [Quote] And she, remembering other things, to me trifles but torturing to her, showed me how life withers when there are things we cannot share. ~~~ Virginia Woolf
Received on Thursday, 28 October 2004 08:45:23 UTC