- From: Anne van Kesteren (fora) <fora@annevankesteren.nl>
- Date: Sun, 30 May 2004 14:35:50 +0200
- To: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@iinet.net.au>
- Cc: W3C CSS List <www-style@w3.org>, public-css-testsuite@w3.org
> Content generated with the ::before and ::after pseudo-elements does > not actually modify the content of the element; only the way it is > presented, and thus does not affect whether or not another selector > matches. The background colour should be red. I see. How about: <test/> test{ background:red; content:"PASS" } test:contains('PASS'){ background:lime } Personally, I don't see a difference here and I think that they all should have a green background (which stands for PASS, obviously). Especially since ':first-letter' _does_ apply to '::before'. That would lead to incosinstency between selectors, something you should avoid, imo. >> Just to be sure, the following won't match, right? >> >> <test>&</test> >> >> test:contains('&'){ background:red } > > > & is an HTML/XML entity, not a CSS entity, so it would not be > converted to an ampersand while parsing the CSS. Therefore the selector > would not match your test element. I expect that it would, however, > match this: > <test>&amp;</test> That would be logical if the first has a 'red' background, which it should have according to the XML parsing rules. I see authors, and maybe implementors make mistakes with this though (Opera did) and therefore it might be good to add it to the official test suite. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/>
Received on Sunday, 30 May 2004 08:36:29 UTC