- From: Bert Bos <bert@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 10:27:26 -0400
- To: www-style@w3.org
Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> I was looking at the definition of the :empty pseudo-class [1] and it
> seems to be rather underdefined to me...
[...]
> but it seems to
> me that the spec should be interoperably implementable based on the
> information contained in the spec. My apologies if this is already on
> the issues list, of course.
Yes, it's underspecified and it's indeed on the WG's issues list. At some point
(hopefully soon) we will publish an updated spec.
I believe these examples cover all cases:
Empty:
<foo/>
<foo></foo>
<foo><!-- empty --></foo>
<foo><?pi?></foo>
<foo><![CDATA[]]</foo>
Not empty:
<foo>text</foo>
<foo> </foo> -- assuming XML, SGML may be different
<foo><bar/></foo>
These cases are also in the Selectors test suite (tests 148-153).
Bert
--
Bert Bos ( W 3 C ) http://www.w3.org/
http://www.w3.org/people/bos W3C/ERCIM
bert@w3.org 2004 Rt des Lucioles / BP 93
+33 4 93 65 76 92 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
Received on Saturday, 22 May 2004 10:28:04 UTC