Re: A heresy ?

Philip TAYLOR wrote:

> There is no doubt at all that CSS-1 was a Good Idea [tm].
> CSS-2 added a great deal.  But CSS-3, whatever it will
> eventually be, seems to me that it is likely to be /so/
> complex, /so/ "all powerful", that few will understand it,
> fewer still will use it, and the great unwashed will
> remain in total ignorance of what they /might/ have been
> able to accomplish had the powers-that-be just "finished off"
> CSS-2 rather than trying to extend CSS to be all things to
> all men.

Ok, what part of CSS-3 is too complex, and what should be done about it?


Received on Friday, 21 May 2004 11:28:52 UTC