- From: Andrew Fedoniouk <news@terrainformatica.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 12:54:13 -0700
- To: "Anne van Kesteren (fora)" <fora@annevankesteren.nl>
- Cc: "W3C Style List" <www-style@w3.org>
Thanks, Anne, > > > 1) To allow use of 'auto' value in padding attributes. So to align container > > content to bottom author may use: > > padding-top:auto; in container's style. > > Isn't going to work. (Incosistent) Could you provide any examples of inconsistency? Or any links to previous discussions ? (keywords would be enough) > > > > 1-%%) To introduce %% units (sorry) as a most generic solution of vertical > > (and horizontal) auto positioning. > > Isn't going to work. (Not solid) Shall I make a "solid" form of proposal? Any interest in %% stuff? Is it worth doing at all? > > > > 2) To introduce content-vertical-align attribute for any arbitrary block. I > > don't like it personally. Too many inconsitencies. > > Isn't going to work. (Not solid) > Agreed. > > 'position:center' has been proposed a while ago in this list [1]. > > [1] <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2004Jan/0218.html> > position: center as far as I can see it is about automatic absolute positioning and has nothing common with block content alignment. And no position: bottom, etc. Andrew Fedoniouk. http://terrainformatica.com
Received on Thursday, 20 May 2004 15:54:21 UTC