- From: Andrew Fedoniouk <news@terrainformatica.com>
- Date: Sun, 16 May 2004 22:13:04 -0700
- To: "fantasai" <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, <www-style@w3.org>
> No, you're proposing the "width: intrinsic" mentioned as a note in the > CSS3 Box draft. :) Negative. Here http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-css3-box-20021024/#the-width I can see only: [Idea by David Baron: add keyword values 'intrinsic' and 'min-intrinsic' to force an element to have its intrinsic or minimum width.] And as far as I understand latin word 'intrinsic' in given context is about properties of 'solid' objects e.g. intrincis image width. > > and set its initial value to none. > > That won't happen, because the current default is interoperably implemented. Also negative. Traditionaly and practicly all UA's try to render HTML as overflow:none set by default. Load <HTML> <P>IAmPrettyLongUnbreakableWord</P> </HTML> in any browser and see by yourself the default behaviour. Andrew Fedoniouk. http://terrainformatica.com > > Andrew Fedoniouk wrote: > > > > But question still remains : > > How to say using current or future CSS "I want this paragraph to occupy > > space as much as needed to show its content in full"? > > > > To be short I am proposing to add value 'none' to the list of all possible > > values of overflow attribute > > No, you're proposing the "width: intrinsic" mentioned as a note in the > CSS3 Box draft. :) > > > and set its initial value to none. > > That won't happen, because the current default is interoperably implemented. > > ~fantasai > > -- > http://fantasai.inkedblade.net/contact >
Received on Monday, 17 May 2004 01:33:15 UTC