- From: Tantek Çelik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>
- Date: Sun, 16 May 2004 18:12:36 -0700
- To: "Sean M. Hall AKA Dante" <pianoman@reno.com>
- Cc: <www-style@w3.org>
On 5/16/04 2:51 PM, "Sean M. Hall AKA Dante" <pianoman@reno.com> wrote:
> I did read the spec, and that was what caused my confusion.
>
> The example gives this:
>
> html {
> height: 100px;
> width: 100px;
> resize: none;
> }
>
> and says that that would display a non-resizable 100px by 100px window.
That example is from the *previous* (LCWD) version of the spec:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-css3-ui-20030703#resize
And is not present in the CR:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/CR-css3-ui-20040511#resize
Please always read (and make comments on) the *CURRENT* version:
http://www.w3.rg/TR/css3-ui#resize
> I agree we need a @viewport rule, but wouldn't that make the :root pseudo
> element unnecessary (in a way)?
You're making the same error that I pointed out in the previous email.
:root (which is a pseudo-class not a pseudo-element) is not the same as the
window.
> I apologize for this confusion,
Don't apologize. Just read the relevant specs before commenting.
> what I meant to say was that applying resize
> the the HTML or BODY elements should be revoked.
Why?
Again, please read CSS2.1 (preferably cover-to-cover), especially the
section on user style sheets and !important.
Tantek
Received on Sunday, 16 May 2004 21:17:34 UTC