- From: Tantek Çelik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>
- Date: Sun, 16 May 2004 18:12:36 -0700
- To: "Sean M. Hall AKA Dante" <pianoman@reno.com>
- Cc: <www-style@w3.org>
On 5/16/04 2:51 PM, "Sean M. Hall AKA Dante" <pianoman@reno.com> wrote: > I did read the spec, and that was what caused my confusion. > > The example gives this: > > html { > height: 100px; > width: 100px; > resize: none; > } > > and says that that would display a non-resizable 100px by 100px window. That example is from the *previous* (LCWD) version of the spec: http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-css3-ui-20030703#resize And is not present in the CR: http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/CR-css3-ui-20040511#resize Please always read (and make comments on) the *CURRENT* version: http://www.w3.rg/TR/css3-ui#resize > I agree we need a @viewport rule, but wouldn't that make the :root pseudo > element unnecessary (in a way)? You're making the same error that I pointed out in the previous email. :root (which is a pseudo-class not a pseudo-element) is not the same as the window. > I apologize for this confusion, Don't apologize. Just read the relevant specs before commenting. > what I meant to say was that applying resize > the the HTML or BODY elements should be revoked. Why? Again, please read CSS2.1 (preferably cover-to-cover), especially the section on user style sheets and !important. Tantek
Received on Sunday, 16 May 2004 21:17:34 UTC