- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 17:28:08 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Ernest Cline <ernestcline@mindspring.com>
- Cc: W3C CSS List <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, Ernest Cline wrote: > > There are in my opinion three flaws with the 'content' property > as currently defined. [1] > > 1) What happened to <attr> values? > CSS 2.1 allows them and the WD doesn't. Moved to CSS3 Values and Units. > 2) It would make sense for <attr> to used like <uri> > if comma separated lists are added. Same. > 3) The fallback value when <uri> fails should be "normal" not "none". > After all, If one can't render the contents of the <uri>, one > would presumably want the usual content to occur which > would be the result of using "normal" The fallback is whatever the author specifies, there is no default. Unless I'm misunderstanding what you meant? -- Ian Hickson )\._.,--....,'``. fL U+1047E /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. http://index.hixie.ch/ `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 10 March 2004 12:28:09 UTC