- From: Ernest Cline <ernestcline@mindspring.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 10:54:17 -0500
- To: "W3C CSS List" <www-style@w3.org>
There are in my opinion three flaws with the 'content' property as currently defined. [1] 1) What happened to <attr> values? CSS 2.1 allows them and the WD doesn't. 2) It would make sense for <attr> to used like <uri> if comma separated lists are added. 3) The fallback value when <uri> fails should be "normal" not "none". After all, If one can't render the contents of the <uri>, one would presumably want the usual content to occur which would be the result of using "normal" [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-css3-content-20030514/#content Ernest Cline ernestcline@mindspring.com
Received on Wednesday, 10 March 2004 10:54:16 UTC