- From: Bigelow, Jim (XHTML-Print) <jim.bigelow@hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 18:54:15 -0600
- To: "W3C Style List" <www-style@w3.org>
Justin, Thank you for your comments on the CR version of the CSS3 Paged Media Module [1], archived in: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2004Jun/0057.html Your issues, shown below, have been assigned comment 02 and 03. Comment 02: > Table 2. Initial values for Margin Boxes > > Is misleading, overall width of the box itself (margin and all) for > top-left-corner (and similar) should not exceed the values of > width and > height as specified, if I understand that correctly, this needs to be > made clearer in the actual (in-fact wrong) definition as the > table dictates. > Comment 03: > page-break-*: > left and right printing defs need to be clarified, that > they apply > only to two sided printing, otherwise the algorithim would result in > never-ending blank pages. And/Or, Facing/Reverse property names > instead (using text direction, ltr text would have "right" as Facing, > and "left" as reverse, typical for most of the other CSS3 > specs, as well > as makes more sense in a page model (japanese readers read > from what the > US readers would call the back of the book, in normal > circumstances for > instance). This may be too late to change property name though. > A reply to your comments is in the works. - Jim Bigelow, editor [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/CR-css3-page-20040225/
Received on Friday, 25 June 2004 20:54:49 UTC