- From: Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 13:51:41 +0100 (BST)
- To: csant <csant@csant.info>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 28 Jul 2004, csant wrote: > > As mentioned in my mail about 'voice-balance', there currently is > a limitation in where to place a 'cue' in a two-channel output > indipendently > from voice-balance. > > It would be nice to add a 'cue-balance' property which would take > the same values as 'voice-balance'. Alteratively I would like to > see the 'voice-' prefix dropped from 'voice-balance' to simply be > 'balance' (or, if a composite name is needed, 'sound-balance') - > of course this would result in much less means to style a page > aurally. Since the voice-balance property does apply to both cues and synthetic speech, a cue-balance property would be redundant. Regards, - -- Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> W3C lead for voice and multimodal. http://www.w3.org/People/Raggett +44 1225 866240 (or 867351) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBCkRjb3AdEmxAsUsRAp7IAKC3zDa7Dkhmcw60TD3UtHCr3jFyXACgvaQ/ PDHKEUOAvAzXmncT4K/M0GY= =cLiJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Friday, 30 July 2004 08:51:37 UTC