- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 13:55:40 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Vincent Starre <thebitman@comcast.net>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Sat, 17 Jan 2004, Vincent Starre wrote: > > I guess I've made my argument for allowing the use of three images per > corner. Does anyone have an argument against? IMHO, 16 images is already an insanely large number. It causes this draft to add a bazillion new properties, almost guarenteeing that nobody will ever implement it, and definitely ensuring that it is impossible for anyone to make a thorough test suite in finite time (and therefore making it very likely that if anyone _did_ implement it, they would not do a reliable job of it). Allowing 24 images would make this already barely tractable problem orders of magnitude worse. > Of course, if this is the wrong place to even mention such things, please > send me a private e-mail telling me who I should talk to. This is exactly the right place. -- Ian Hickson )\._.,--....,'``. fL U+1047E /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. http://index.hixie.ch/ `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Sunday, 18 January 2004 08:55:41 UTC