- From: Christian Roth <roth@visualclick.de>
- Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 14:29:34 +0200
- To: "www-style Mailing List" <www-style@w3.org>
The selector grammar [1] defines a simple_selector_sequence as follows:
simple_selector_sequence
: [ type_selector | universal ]?
[ HASH | class | attrib | pseudo_class | negation ]+
| type_selector | universal ;
However, negation is nowhere defined in the grammar. Likewise, the
Selectors module prose does not mention a negative selector, only the
negation pseudo-class, which only takes a simple selector.
Is this an omission in the prose or a superfluous element in the grammar?
Does a selector like
not( DIV[test] > P )
exist, representing all elements but P elements which have a parent DIV
with attribute test?
Regards, Christian
[1] <http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/CR-css3-selectors-20011113/#grammar>
Received on Tuesday, 24 August 2004 12:45:53 UTC