- From: Christian Roth <roth@visualclick.de>
- Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 14:29:34 +0200
- To: "www-style Mailing List" <www-style@w3.org>
The selector grammar [1] defines a simple_selector_sequence as follows: simple_selector_sequence : [ type_selector | universal ]? [ HASH | class | attrib | pseudo_class | negation ]+ | type_selector | universal ; However, negation is nowhere defined in the grammar. Likewise, the Selectors module prose does not mention a negative selector, only the negation pseudo-class, which only takes a simple selector. Is this an omission in the prose or a superfluous element in the grammar? Does a selector like not( DIV[test] > P ) exist, representing all elements but P elements which have a parent DIV with attribute test? Regards, Christian [1] <http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/CR-css3-selectors-20011113/#grammar>
Received on Tuesday, 24 August 2004 12:45:53 UTC