Re: border-spacing flaw

> [Original Message]
> From: Håvard Skjæveland <>
> Let me try to be a little more precise: I'm wondering why
> isn't a shorthand property for 'border-spacing-top', 
> 'border-spacing-right', 'border-spacing-bottom' and
> Is there a reason why you can only have one value (applies to all four 
> sides) or two (applies to horizontal sides and vertical sides, 
> respectively) values? Why isn't it done in the same fashion as the 
> 'border-width', 'margin' and 'padding' properties, where you can have 
> one, two, three or four values?

To begin with, 'border-spacing' specifies spacing between the borders of
adjacent cells.  This spacing is specified at the table level, not the cell
level.  The result is that for inter-cell spacing, you would always be
adding together 'border-spacing-top' and 'border-spacing-bottom' to
get 'border-spacing-height', so why not just use a single value instead
of two?  'border-spacing' also affects the spacing between the border
of the boundary cells and the border of the table.  While it might be
conceivable that one would want a different value here from the
inter-cell spacing, that effect is not common desired, and can be
achieved in other ways, so keeping things down to simply two values
is a good idea in my opinion,

Received on Monday, 26 April 2004 13:23:21 UTC