- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 14:55:34 -0700
- To: www-style@w3.org
- Message-ID: <20040419215534.GA9821@darby.dbaron.org>
On Monday 2004-04-19 17:39 -0400, Ernest Cline wrote: > You've given an extremely pathological case here thanks to > the direction:ltr. Without the ltr, then by the bidi rules this would > be a rtl paragraph with a lot of ltr text embedded in it, so it would In HTML [1] and CSS [2], there is always a direction, so the bidi rules for automatic determination of paragraph embedding level [3] never apply. So this is no more an "extremely pathological case" than any other occurence of bidirectionality. -David [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-html401-19991224/struct/dirlang.html#h-8.2.2 [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/CR-CSS21-20040225/visuren.html#propdef-direction [3] Unicode 3.0, section 3.12, "Resolving Embedding Levels", rules P2 and P3. Note that immediately following rule P3 is the text "Note that when a higher level protocol specifies the paragraph level, it is not necessary to apply rules P2 and P3." (I couldn't find the corresponding section in Unicode 4.0, but it's probably there somewhere.) -- L. David Baron <URL: http://dbaron.org/ >
Received on Monday, 19 April 2004 17:56:08 UTC