Re: content: url() is bad wrote:
> Aha sorry, i didn't realise quirks could possibly affect something 
> like this (is "replacedness" of broken images really a major 
> backwards-compatibility issue?).

Think spacer.gif images that are 404 (very common, actually).  If you 
replace them with an inline representation of the alt text (not even 
usually empty!)....


Received on Thursday, 15 April 2004 09:25:49 UTC