- From: Philip TAYLOR <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
- Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2004 11:51:18 +0100
- To: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
David Woolley wrote: >>Why ? If the user suffers from epilepsy, disabling "blink" >>(but not disabling underline or whatever) would seem to be >>an eminently sensible decision. > > > Why does that not count as an argument for making it a property in > its own right? My apologies, I mis-interpreted your original posting. However, singling out one property for special treatment seems ill-advised to me : whilst we might not be able to think at the moment why one might want to selectively disable (say) underlining whilst retaining all other text-decoration attributes, it is by no means obvious that a perfectly valid reason for wishing to so do might not emerge in the future. Philip Taylor, RHBNC
Received on Friday, 2 April 2004 05:52:47 UTC